Showing posts with label apex and palmer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apex and palmer. Show all posts

Monday, October 28, 2019

Groundhog Day at the Quads: Nov. 2, 10 a.m.

Eagle at Celery Fields
-- courtesy of Chuck Behrmann

Last Stand


MEDIA ADVISORY

November 2, 2019

Adrien Lucas 941-539-9044 / Tom Matrullo 941-321-7663

The Sarasota Board of County Commissioners has initiated a "CAP" / Critical Area Plan report for the public lands known as “the Quads” adjacent to the Celery Fields. That plan will be heard at their November 6th meeting. What the Board decides holds the future for these public lands. We must stop them for good this time and ensure that our Quad properties are saved from development.

WHAT: A peaceful rally to protest against the Sarasota Board of Commissioners ignoring robust community opinion regarding rezones and sales of public lands surrounding Our Celery Fields owned by the people of Sarasota County.

WHEN / WHERE:  Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. / Corner of Palmer Blvd. and Apex Rd.

PARKING: Off of Palmer Road, park your car on the berm of Palmer Road where it is legal to park: we encourage people to carpool and to leave the Celery Fields parking lot open for visitors.

WHO: A broad-based, non-partisan group of Sarasota County taxpayers, Neighborhood Association members, Sarasota Bird Watchers and Park-Goers will be gathering in protest to what continues to be one of a growing number of “biggest blunders” by Sarasota County Government officials.

WHY:
  • 2017: we defeated the county from selling quad properties to Saudi-owned Restaurant Depot and we kept TST Ventures from building a debris demolition facility next to Our Celery Fields. 
  • 2018: Sarasota County Commissioners hired a consultant to study the “highest and best use” of the Quads, spending $61K to rubber stamp what the board has always wanted -- the consultant returning the verdict of best use as “industry.” The county commissioners ignored thoughtful and well-prepared community input by numerous community groups, so,
  • Here we are again: “County Groundhog Day” fighting for the commissioners to back off and recognize that the County is failing to adhere to its own standard that "Zoning's fundamental purpose is to Protect a Community's Health, Safety and Welfare."

WE ARE NON-PARTISAN NIMBYS

WE GATHER OUR COMMUNITY TO SHARE
INFORMATION AND SOLIDARITY AGAINST THE SALE OF
LANDS NEAR OUR CELERY FIELD!
                                     FACEBOOK EVENT: CLICK

Friday, October 4, 2019

Comment #2 on Critical Area Plan for the Quad Parcels at the Celery Fields

October 4, 2019

Mr. Steve Kirk
Sarasota County
Planning and Development Services
1660 Ringling Blvd.
Sarasota, FL

Re:  Critical Area Plan for the Palmer Blvd./Quads Area

Dear Mr. Kirk,

I appreciate your compiling the diverse attributes of my neighborhood and laying out some interpretations in the Critical Area Plan draft.  This is indeed a grand undertaking, and I’m sure you’ve put in many hours!

I see: Adopted in 1985, the CAP was privately initiated and required to meet the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan to map the designated industrial area. 

Click to enlarge
I would be curious to know who initiated this CAP, and if these “players” are still around today.  Even back then, you would think any plan would be publicly initiated.

The draft outlines the zoning districts listed below. I believe Figure 5 should have widened the territory to include a much larger view, and the acreages should be given for residential in the wider area.

The following zoning districts (Figure 5) and acreages exist within the CAP:
  •  PID (Planned Industrial Development) - 167.4
  •  ILW (Industrial, Light Manufacturing and Warehousing) - 75
  •  OUR (Open Use Rural) (Quad’s parcels) - 55.2
  •  PED (Planned Economic Development) (SPA 3) - 29
  •  GU (Government Use) (Ackerman Park, fire station) - 30.2
  •  OUE-1 (Open Use Estate) (stormwater pond) - 15.7
  •  PCD (Planned Commerce Development) - 12.3

Some of the recommended permitted uses should be prohibited, such as the following:
  • Light Industrial (there is enough current capacity in the industrial parks)
  • Office                                                    
  • Research laboratory
  • Warehouse and freight movement
  • Wholesale trade
  • Vocational, trade or business school
  • College or university
  • Vehicle service
  • Sale of vehicle parts and accessories
  • Sale of lumber and building supplies
Implementing Zoning Districts

The Comprehensive Plan identifies the implementing zoning districts for each future land use designation. The following are the implementing zoning districts identified for the MEC designation:
  •  ILW (Industrial Light Manufacturing & Warehousing)
  •  IR (Industrial Research)
  •  PCD (Planned Commerce District) (Planned District)
  •  PED (Planned Economic Development) (Planned District)
  •  GU (Government Use)
Also, I disagree with this recommendation:

N.W. and S.W. Quads
Industrial / Office - Suitable
  • Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and surrounding uses.
  •  Low traffic generator
  •  Retains MEC land in employment use.
An additional zoning district should be added to the UDC: Parks and Recreation.  I think that this should be recommended rather than the blanket MEC.

Just as the City of Sarasota is looking at amending zoning to create this set-apart district, Sarasota County should have such a zoning district.

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

I do not see any solicitation of opinions from public/private/charter schools regarding student transportation needs.  Would you please reach out to some entities for input?

Center Road and Lorraine Road

The completion of the gap in Center Road between Fruitville Road and Palmer Boulevard should be considered to generally improve connectivity in the area of the CAP and complete a mobility loop through the CAP and around the Celery Fields. Alternatively, the construction of a pedestrian/bike path in the area of this gap could be considered.

The Critical Area Plan for this area necessarily involves a discussion of the
extension of Lorraine Road from Palmer Boulevard to Fruitville.  Also, traffic on Palmer from Lorraine to Debrecen will soon be “F” LOS, from Debrecen to Fruitville “F”, and from Debrecen to Lorraine on Fruitville “F” (per traffic engineer Kwamena Sankah).  Why does this matter?  Because traffic that can’t get to Fruitville will even more clog the Apex area.

Traffic studies – current and anticipatory – are notoriously flawed.  It’s impossible to believe studies will approach reality.  They haven’t in the past, and that will be the future story.
Mitigating Improvements Section 3, Mobility, of this study indicated that the improvements associated with the Cattlemen Road Construction Phase II project and the construction of a roundabout or signalization of the Apex Road and Palmer Boulevard intersection will improve the roadway level of service (LOS) in the area. However, the LOS for that section of Palmer Boulevard west of Apex Road will likely continue to be below the adopted LOS. Also, identified as a mitigating improvement is the expansion to 4 lanes of Palmer Boulevard from Porter Road to Apex Road. However, that expansion would conflict with the objective of preserving the existing character of Palmer Boulevard with its open corridor and roadway section also identified in this study. With the development of any of the Quads parcels, Transportation Planning will identify certain improvements such as turn lanes that will be required to accommodate the traffic generated by a proposed use.
There really is no use that won’t increase traffic and ruin the larger neighborhood character.   Keep in mind that identified capital project needs require funding of $1.2 billion.  Where will money come from for creative roadway improvements that will serve the community in a respectful way?

Public/Civic – Suitable  - Agree – but what?
  • Allowed as part of mixed use in PCD and PED. Limited to 50% of PCD. Traditional town center design requirements must be met in PED. N.W. Quad may be too small for PED design requirements
  • No limitations in GU district.
The public has clearly spoken about public uses, so there is no lack of input there. Any use should be put to the public test, with open communication.  Any government uses (Natural History Museum?) should be also put to the public test.

Sincerely,

Glenna Blomquist

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Fire Station workshop set for Jan. 23

Parcel #3 -- the NW quadrant at Apex and Palmer -- has long been considered for the site of a new Fire Station. A neighborhood workshop is set for Wednesday Jan. 23, 6 p.m. to describe the plan and receive community feedback. Brian Lichterman is the agent, and the workshop will meet at Colonial Oaks Park Meeting Room A, 5300 Colonial Oaks Blvd. More detail below.





Monday, October 8, 2018

Letter to the Sarasota Board regarding proposed industrialization near Celery Fields


Celery Fields courtesy of Emanuel Guzman

To: The Board of Sarasota County Commissioners
Re: Fresh Start statement in response to Lambert assessment industrializing parcel #3
Date: October 8, 2018

On Wednesday morning, Oct. 10, 2018, you will discuss an outside consultant’s recommendation to rezone a public parcel at Apex Rd. and Palmer Blvd. to industrial use.

As many are aware, Fresh Start has engaged in a nine-month dialog with the Board and staff regarding the fate of public lands in the Celery Fields Area. Yet despite this effort at mutual understanding, key questions remain unanswered.

Some of these questions specifically concern the recently completed assessment by your consultant, Lambert Advisory LLC -- an assessment based on spreadsheet comparables to the exclusion of real world considerations, such as road conditions or community values.

Other questions concern larger issues of planning and policy which lie at the root of land stewardship at this critical moment in the development of Northeast Sarasota County.

Take Surplus Land Policy for example: Before all else, why sell public land? Once sold, it’s gone forever. Neither the Lambert assessment nor the staff briefing states any reason why it benefits the community to sell this land.

Piecemeal planning: You have plucked one parcel (#3) from a complex interconnected area in transition and are seeking to rezone it for industry -- a use appropriate to 1983 -- without a glance at the larger relevant context. Fresh Start spent 9 months attempting to paint this larger picture from the residents' perspective. As stewards of our public lands, what proactive vision is guiding you now and for the coming explosion of development in East Sarasota?

MEC and Industry: Lambert Advisory's blunt determination that "industry" -- with no qualification as to what sort of industry -- would bring the highest price for parcel #3 is at odds with market activity at the Fruitville Initiative. That nearby area has more than 200 acres, all of which, like parcel #3, are designated MEC, but there appears to be no demand for industry. Various plans submitted to the County for the Fruitville Initiative are all multi-family residential. Given that these property owners presumably are marketing their properties to the highest and best use, there seems to be a significant disconnect between the reality created by the Lambert report and what's actually occurring on the ground. The Lambert finding warrants rigorous review and reconciliation to assure that the return on the public’s investment is not being short-changed.

Scoping task #4: Fresh Start asked to communicate with Lambert while the Consultant was doing its research. County staff opposed any communication:
Out of an abundance of caution to the process, I would not be comfortable with a private group directly communicating with a consultant on an item that will culminate in a quasi-hearing on a Board directive that was decidedly different from your own. (Email from county planner to Fresh Start dated 7.2.18).
How did this sidelining of the community advance the consultant’s task, which was to base findings on "a general understanding of the community and its residents"? (Scope #4).

Actual Road Conditions: Road conditions were the largest factor in last year's hearings concerning proposed industrial uses on parcel 2. To an inquiry from Fresh Start as to what information the County provided to Lambert regarding roads and traffic, the Lambert researcher replied:
At the time of the study, we were not aware of any documented issues related to development constraints, including roadway capacity.
  • Why was essential data about the fragile road situation on Palmer Blvd. and Apex Rd not provided to the consultant? 
  • Developer James Gabbert estimates that his Waste Transfer Station planned for six acres along Porter Rd. and Palmer Boulevard will generate at least 100 trucks a day, entering and leaving his new facility at Palmer and Bell Rd. 
  • The Board expressed concern about road conditions on Sept. 12 when Fresh Start discussed light recreational and civic uses on these parcels. Where’s that concern now?
Foregrounding Industry: Anyone driving along Palmer Blvd. and Apex Rd. would not know there are small industrial and office parks nearby -- they are hidden by landscaping, by Ackerman Park, and by office buildings. Rezoning parcel #3 for industry redefines the character of the area -- from open space rural to industrial -- the very thing residents area have strongly opposed since January 2017.

Domino Effect: If parcel #3 goes to industry, parcel #2 will be surrounded by industrial uses on three sides. Mr. Gabbert's waste transfer station is already in the works for the six acres along the west side of parcel #2; Robert Waechter owns warehouses screened by trees immediately south of it. How long will it take before someone proposes that it “makes sense” to rezone parcel #2 for industry?

Irreparable damage

For these good reasons and more, Fresh Start opposes Sarasota County's rezoning and sale of any of our public lands at Apex and Palmer to private industrial developers. Approving industry here will compromise everything that planning is supposed to be about: Optimizing road safety, environment, community resources, aesthetics and economic value.

Sarasota has long enjoyed a reputation as one of the rare counties that's met developers seeking uncontrolled growth with intelligent restraint, a sense of design, and an awareness of tradition.

As our nine-month effort has made clear, many commonsense, beneficial alternatives exist for these public parcels. We urge you to respect this place of birds, fresh air and open space -- respect this unique place and the people from near and far who love it.

While the Celery Fields area itself lacks sufficient parking and complementary amenities such as a place for a bite to eat, where are the County’s plans for those real needs? Instead you are spending tax dollars to rezone a public parcel without a buyer in sight, or any industrial proposal on the table.

On Sept. 12 Fresh Start respectfully asked that you adopt a basic resolution:
  • To dedicate the Celery Fields Quads to beneficial public uses in perpetuity;
  • To actively seek and formally approve uses for these lands only after completing careful study of trending markets and opportunities; and
  • To invest in a plan that realizes the community’s vision.
We remain steadfast in supporting this course of action.

If you go forward with this rezoning, Sarasota will be known as the place where, over the unequivocal opposition of its citizens, the Board compromised the safety, the environmental health, and the future prospects of a pristine 360-acre birding sanctuary, recreation, tourism and residential area.

Sincerely,

Glenna Blomquist, Carlos Correa, Tom Matrullo, Gary Walsh

Executive Council for the Fresh Start Initiative

From November 2017 to September 2018, Fresh Start invested well over 1,000 volunteer hours gathering ideas, community support, and expert perspectives on the Celery Fields Area. Its July report is here. A "big picture" presentation is incorporated in this report, which was presented to the Board on Sept. 12. 2018 in video format. More about the Lambert Advisory report here and here.

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Planning a proposal? Here's a factsheet on the Quad Parcels

If you plan to work on a citizens' community proposal for the Quad Parcels, some basic info is below.

Timing:

We ask that proposals be submitted to CeleryFieldsForever@gmail.com by March 1. A review of proposals is tentatively scheduled for March 15, and a public workshop to determine which proposals will be submitted to the County is tentatively set for March 30th -- confirmation of dates, times and locations TBA.

Quad Parcels #1, #2, #3 at Apex Rd. and Palmer Blvd.

The Quad Parcels:

Parcel #1: 13 acres, Southeast Quadrant of Palmer Boulevard and Apex Road:
Immediately adjacent to Celery Fields wetlands, this parcel can buffer the preserve and offer low-intensity commercial and public uses on the east side of Apex Road that are compatible with the Celery Fields as an international birding area. 
Goal: Identify compatible and enhancing public and commercial uses for the community.
Update: The County Commission took this parcel off of the Surplus Lands List on Jan. 30, 2018. For now it is Open Use Rural Zoning, but further land use changes are possible. 

Parcel #2: 10.7 acres, Southwest Quadrant of Palmer Boulevard and Apex Road:
A planned, already approved, 6-acre waste transfer station is adjacent to the west side of the parcel, separated by a treeline.   
This parcel is a transition parcel between the Celery Fields and the Packinghouse district, west of Apex.
Currently authorized future land use: Office-professional with Apex corner set aside for commercial. 
Goal: Identify uses consistent with transition from Celery Fields to Packinghouse.

Linear Dimensions of Parcels #1 and #2

Not for community proposals:

Parcel #3: 6.9 acres in the Northwest Quadrant of Palmer Boulevard and Apex Road (currently has temporary fire station).
The Board has decided to hire a commercial broker to rezone Parcel #3:
Coordination between Fresh Start and County is recommended.


Aerial close up

Courtesy of the Sarasota News Leader