Showing posts with label quad parcels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quad parcels. Show all posts

Friday, April 29, 2022

Was the Conservation Easement a Bait & Switch?

Mike Moran and Al Maio – the two commissioners who voted for James Gabbert’s giant, outdoor debris pulverizing plant on the SW Quad parcel – are now pushing a building lobbyist's proposal that would put a builder's showcase there, despite the fact that the proposal violates the Conservation Easement approved by the Board in 2020.

M&M were joined by Cutsinger and Ziegler in the 4-1 vote to fast-track the BIA proposal.

Excerpts below are from the 4.29.22 Sarasota News Leader article.

With Detert objecting, County Commission authorizes staff to negotiate with Manatee-Sarasota Business Industry Association to take over Florida House lease and move building 

Making the motion, Commissioner Moran calls for ‘plenty of public input’ on proposal during future board meeting


Commissioner Michael Moran this week won the support of his other three colleagues to authorize county staff to start negotiating with the Manatee-Sarasota Business Industry Association over the future of the Florida House.

Formally, Moran specified county talks with the Business Industry Association (MSBIA) “and/or any nonprofit that’s affiliated with [it]” to take over the county’s lease of the 4454 S. Beneva Road site in Sarasota where the Florida House stands. That lease will end on June 30, 2027, county staff has noted.

Further, Moran called for allowing the MSBIA or the nonprofit to move the building before that lease expires.

The MSBIA has created a nonprofit organization called the Building Industry Institute....

The MSBIA proposal in a June 7, 2021 letter from its CEO, Jon Mast, to County Administrator Jonathan Lewis — plus comments from MSBIA board member Teresa Mast, who addressed the commissioners at an Open to the Public comment period during the commission’s Feb. 8 meeting — included the desire to move the Florida House to one of the Quads. Those four county-owned parcels are adjacent to the Celery Fields.

Although the latter area officially is a county stormwater management project, it also is an internationally known bird-watching destination.

In October 2020, the commissioners voted unanimously to approve a conservation easement over the Southwest, Southeast and Northeast Quads, in collaboration with the Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast, which is based in Osprey, and the Sarasota Audubon Society.

The MSBIA has shifted its focus to a Southwest Quad site. ...

Detert said she objected to Moran’s motion. “We haven’t had a lot of meetings about it,” she began. “We probably need to.” ....

She said she believed all of the commissioners have met with MSBIA representatives one-on-one. “You’re kind of writing a motion in favor of one corporation,” she told Moran. ....

When Chair Alan Maio called for the vote on Moran’s motion, Detert repeated her objection to it. The motion passed 4-1.

. . . leaders of the Florida House Institute — which has become Southface Sarasota — have adamantly expressed opposition to the MSBIA proposal.

... former Florida House director Matt Ross, who founded the company Eco$mart, in 1993, stressed to the commissioners during public comments on Feb. 23 that in his 29 years of working with the Florida House, he had “not seen the [MSBIA’s] presence at all.”

When the Florida House suffered through “lean times” in the early 2000s, Ross continued, “Where was the builders’ association? They weren’t there.”

MSBIA head Jon Mast


...
Notes below on key points -

===========

Some key takeaways:

1. The Board chose to promote one proposal – from a lobby, the Manatee/Sarasota Building Industry Association BIA – over Commissioner Detert’s motion to hear from staff about several options for the Florida House.

2. The BIA Lobby wishes to take for its own use a parcel that was given to the people of Sarasota (via two Environmental Non-profits, Sarasota Audubon and the Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast) to protect a bird nesting preserve and to foster community with a civic use – a Sarasota history archive, for example.

3. The BIA Lobby wants to rezone the SW Quad to ILW – Industry, light manufacturing, warehouse – apparently not finding any incompatibility with the Conservation Easement.

4. The county’s own documents and Conservation Easement reflect the fact that the intent of the Conservation Easement was for civic or government use, and use by a private organization is expressly disallowed by its terms.

5. Those who have had long and intimate participation in the Florida House say the Lobby has lied in pretending to have helped the Florida House when it needed it, or taken any interest in it before now.


Sunday, March 8, 2020

Quads update and a blueprint for water quality


Via a conference call on Thursday, Christine Johnson updated progress on the Quad parcels and other projects.

Quads: The CF has met three times with County staff and there is confidence they will have permanent easements in place by the beginning of summer on the three parcels (1,2,4) which the County has agreed to give in perpetuity.

  • Parcels 1 and 4 - the Eastern quad parcels - are to be left natural for the most part. Johnson did say there could be some work to bring the canal that runs between the SE parcel and the Celery Fields to a better level of development. I.e., it has paths where people walk, run, bicycle - these might be improved.
  • Parcel 2 (SW) could have some development component that would allow for parking. One of the major issues with the entire area is how little parking and other welcoming facilities are there for visitors.
Once these easements are in place, the property will be left to the CF and Audubon to develop and maintain. It is anticipated there will be no county funding. Here's where the community is likely to be invited to step up and help out.

The Foundation is also working toward solutions for other properties, including the giant Orange Hammock near North Port. The latest on this 5,500-acre site is that the CF has until June 1 to come up with $1.5 million for it. Johnson said this is a key project in that it not only means fewer homes, but also protects drinking water, serves as animal habitat, protects against floods, and still offers recreative and eco-tourism uses. Amazingly, Johnson says the CF is already 41% on its way to the $1.5 million needed.
More here.

Updates on other projects, including Bobby Jones, the Felts preserve, and more - can be found via links here.

a blueprint for
water quality improvement
to stop feeding
harmful algae blooms

As many know, Jon Thaxton and Steve Suau were two of the key people behind the creation of the Celery Fields Water Management facility. 

They're still concerned with water, and will be giving several talks on the results of a year's research on nutrients in our soil, and how they affect our bays and waterways. It's a wake-up call for us all. 

Jon and Steve will be at the Robert L. Anderson Administration Center in Venice this Tuesday (March 10) shortly after 1:30 pm presenting to the Board of Sarasota County Commissioners.

Also on Tuesday, they'll do a broader version of their work at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Venice at 7 pm. It's at 1971 Pinebrook Rd, Venice, Florida 34292.

And they'll be presenting at CONA Sarasota on Friday March 20, at 7, at the Waldemere Fire Station.

Some slides from the "Playbook" are here. For the interpretive commentary, try to get to one of these presentations -- we all affect water quality, and in turn it affects us all.



Monday, October 14, 2019

Oct. 15, 2019 Email to Sarasota Planning

Dear Mr. Osterhoudt, Ms. Grogg, and Mr. Kirk,

I wish to point you to a concept touched on in a story in today's Herald Tribune, entitled Celery Fields lovers keep an eye on the land next door.

The point has to do with the evolution of something new - unplanned, unanticipated. When this happens, and when it's a good thing, is it not in the public interest for this new beneficence to be recognized, its trending potential protected, and its future prospects planned for?

Is the best way to do this to act as if nothing has happened, and it's still 1975? 


It's not every day that a code-based bureaucracy has to grapple with a radically new natural phenomenon. But you know, that's where you might find something to be enthusiastic about -- a challenge to entrenched ways of seeing and doing, an unexpected grace of Nature that calls for an equally unexpected grace of human imagination and spirit.

It is profoundly disappointing that our elected officials have so far been unmoved by self-evident natural beauty and community commitment to the Celery Fields.

It's not clear from our reading of the CAP [Critical Area Plan] that you've taken a close enough look at the community that will be impacted by whatever goes on the Quads. How many of the questions below does your CAP actually explore?

Please request more time if necessary to do a full visioning plan for the entire Celery Fields Area. There is no rush - no one is at the door, seeking to build there. This would be a very good moment to explore the beauty and graces of the New.

Questions appended below.

Respectfully,

Tom Matrullo

There’s a great deal of knowledge about the area that this CAP should see as its duty to address -- real-life factors for thousands of people who now live there:

  1. What do actual trends in the industrial park show in terms of vacancies, land prices, rental prices?
  2. Why is no one seeking to purchase the MEC parcels in the 240 acres of the Fruitville Initiative for industry? 
  3. Where are the vectors that would demonstrate the obvious fact that Board actions have changed the area in an overwhelming way to residential and recreational?
  4. Traffic analysis should include the peak times, patterns and needs of the immediate community.
  5. How many school children ride how many buses to school that stop on Palmer Blvd.? Why do they stop right in front of the Celery Fields Parking Lot and block all traffic in both directions? How can this be improved?
  6. How many people use the Celery Fields, at what times of day, what days of the week, for what purposes?
  7. How many groups use the Celery Fields for sports training, environmental studies, teaching, birdwatching, picnicking, stargazing, photography, dogwalking, kayaking, exercise, wedding photos and so many more purposes?
  8. With evermore recreational users and visitors - human and avian - from elsewhere, what plans are underway to to meet  anticipated needs for parking and complementary activities such as a place to sit and enjoy a meal?

Without fully studying the area, how can you possibly plan in a way that offers reliable estimates of probable impacts?

Above except from Comment of Oct. 5.

Friday, October 4, 2019

Comment #3 on Plan for Quads at the Celery Fields

5. The Quad Parcels - Utilities

Utilities Potable water and wastewater systems will be served by Sarasota County Utilities. Reclaimed water is not currently available to these sites. Potable water is available through either an existing 16-inch DI potable water main along Palmer Boulevard or a 12-inch PVC potable water main along Apex Road. The water distribution system will need to be extended in a manner that minimizes dead ends by providing a looped system that reduces the need for the flushing of water lines. Wastewater service is available through an 8-inch gravity line located along Apex Road. The Fancy Farms Lift Station that serves the Quads parcels, near the corner of Apex Road and Tower Lane, has limited capacity available. Currently the lift station can accept up to 18 EDU’s, (3,600 gallons per day (GPD) of average daily flow) from the Quads parcels. This lift station currently accepts wastewater flows from the Fruitville Library, SWFWMD office, the Fruitville Park of Commerce, and the Texaco station at the corner of Fruitville Road and East Road (the Fruitville East developments).

During the planning for the Fruitville Initiative (SPA 3) development, Public Utilities identified the need for a new forcemain along Coburn/Apex Road to accept new flow from SPA 3. Public Utilities intends to enter into an oversize agreement with a developer when the first increment of SPA 3 south of Fruitville Road is ready construct. This is expected to occur within the next 3-5 years. At that time, and with the new oversized forcemain in service, flow from the Fruitville East developments will be redirected into the new forcemain in order to gain back additional capacity in the Fancy Farms Lift Station that could be made available to serve additional development on the Quads parcels.

"Public Utilities intends to enter into an oversize agreement with a developer when the first increment of SPA 3 south of Fruitville Road is ready construct."The above sentence is too vague. Intent or not of Public Utilities, unless the county has a contract in writing with financial costs associated and share cost analysis with the undetermined "Developer" this leaves the public, who will be responsible for this co-paying of using county tax dollars way, way too vague. And has county history has shown, time and time again, the burden of financial costs falls squarely on Sarasota county and not the developers. We, the people are tired of picking up Developer's costs and corporation welfare. The county MUST provide accurate forecasting, not vague intent.


5. The Quad Parcels - Environmental

The Quads parcels have historically been under agricultural cultivation. The area was used for vegetable production between 1924 and 1995 that would have involved the use of agri- chemicals. In addition, soils with arsenic levels above the residential soil cleanup target level were stockpiled on the sites. Because of this history, it is recommended that some site assessment work be done to determine what, if any, action should be taken prior to development. Similar site assessment activities were recently completed on the new fire station site.

"... it is recommended that some site assessment work be done to determine what, if any, action should be taken prior to development. Similar site assessment activities were recently completed on the new fire station site."


"some" site assessment is too vague on land that Mr. Hines is suggestion affordable housing. Human beings should not be housed, poor or wealthy, on land that clearly has issues of such varied soil contamination.


N.W. Quad: There are no native habitats or grand trees, and a cluster of four cabbage palms is located at the south east corner of the site. Evidence of listed wildlife species has not been previously documented, however, prior to development, a professional wildlife survey will be required. A landscape buffer of live oaks planted 25-feet on center exists along the north property line on the adjacent property. A 0.4 opacity landscape buffer will be provided with development of the fire station site adjacent to this parcel.

" Evidence of listed wildlife species has not been previously documented, however, prior to development, a professional wildlife survey will be required."

In 2017 Matt Osterhoudt performed the county study on the parcels that the county tried to sell to TST Ventures & Restaurant Depot. Mr. Osterhoudt reported during that he had not witnessed any wildlife species. People in the community have demonstrated and can do so again, that if the survey were performed by a professional naturalist, bird, insect and wildlife can be easily documented with our very own human eyeballs and good pair of binoculars.This type of study takes patience and not just a couple hours.

As I am sure you are aware, Florida's Sunshine Laws are among the strongest in the nation, giving every citizen access to the information necessary for participating in the democratic process. These laws protect a citizen's right to know how government operates, making information such as public events, government meeting minutes, and court proceedings available. The Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller's office fully supports transparency and accountability.

I insist that Sarasota County perform its "wildlife study" with Sarasota Audubon and a few other community witnesses. Must species counts are done in group, not solo, not one human, groups. The hours of this study should be conducted in a wide range of hours, i.e. a full day of observation on the N.W. Quad, early a.m. hours when birds are busy. You know that phrase, "the early bird gets the worm," well it is true. Early a.m. to mid p.m. and for consideration late p.m. hours, because while Mr. Osterhoudt is sleeping, wildlife carries on during evening hours too.

To save time, the above should be applied to the SW & SE Quad parcels as well.

Potential Development Conditions

The following conditions related to Palmer Boulevard and the development of the Quads parcels are intended to preserve and enhance the open character of the Palmer Boulevard corridor within the CAP and the connected open space and views of the Celery Fields identified earlier in this study. Some of the elements of the conditions are illustrated in Figure 21.

• Establish limitations on the construction of buildings or other structures on the N.E. Quad and the northeast portion of the S.E. Quad in order to preserve the Palmer Boulevard/Celery Fields open space/view shed.


The county report is way too vague, if the county insists on selling these public lands, determination of the structures that may be developed must be presented to the public.

• Establish Palmer Boulevard building setbacks and landscape buffers measured from the 170-foot roadway section. Building setbacks should be a minimum of 35-feet.
         35 feet building setbacks imply that density will be built up.
• Establish building height limitations based on proximity to Palmer Boulevard.

35 feet building setbacks imply that development's only choice on these tiny parcels is density and the thrust will be to build up.

Why has staff not given examples now, in this report? This is too vague, there is enough data out there for county staff to provide accurate height limitations now. Staff needs to provide established building height limitatioads, ons TODAY.

Considering the Benderson Stickney Point/Tamiami Trail development, density, set backs and height has been changed a number of times due to county mistakes and Benderson pressure to build whatever a Benderson-type manages to shove through.

• Provide regulations and/or guidelines on landscape materials and elements, including lighting, to be used along the Palmer Boulevard roadway frontage and within the Palmer Boulevard/Celery Fields view shed.
The word “Guidelines” are too wiggly. The Celery Fields need to be protected from lighting due to the known dangers of lighting used at night. A recent article in the NY TImes,The 9/11 Tribute Lights Are Endangering 160,000 Birds a Year, cites that light during the night causes birds to collide into buildings. Death from evening lights put up by humans confuses birds and is responsible for as many as 600 million bird deaths a year across the U.S. This information comes from Audubon.

There should be NO more additional lighting added for p.m. lighting near the Celery Fields or quad properties. Period.

• Establish minimum open space and architectural design criteria for buildings constructed on Quads parcels to ensure a high level of design and quality development.

Again, staff is too vague, "Establish minimum” implies the county will be very hands off and grant a potential developer the directive of establishing criteria for the Quads. This is unacceptable. Anything that may be developed on these lands must involve the community. Essentially, if this open ended "establish minimum" sentence stands, a Developer gets to use Sarasota County staff and commission as a concierge service for almost whatever they try to develop to build on Quad parcels.

Mobility

Traffic Generation For the purpose of understanding the traffic impacts resulting from the development of various uses of the Quads parcels, trip generation tables, located in Appendix B, were constructed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation. Separate tables are provided for each parcel based on the differing acreage. The number of units (square feet, residential units) for each use represents a maximum or reasonable build-out of each parcel. Plans were developed (Appendix C) using the S.W. Quad as a model to establish a basis for the number of units for various uses.


We insist, county staff, along with whatever consultant is hired, must include community witnesses.

The study must be performed during the hours of 7AM - 7PM, during dates that will ensure accurate traffic count numbers during high season, school season, and should be performed Monday - Friday along with a Saturday during high season. Measurements should include number of cars, motorcycles, bicycles, neighborhood walkers, traffic in and out of Audubon, etc.

From past mobility traffic generation reports, we, the public, have no way of really believing the staff reports. As what I have witnessed, along with knowing many people who live off of Palmer have said to me, in addition to businesses at the intersection of Palmer and Cattleman, the county traffic reports are negligent in their numbers and low ball the reality that further introduction of more vehicles to this area for industrial development does the community no favors.

Respectfully submitted for the county commission packet for the November 6th meeting.

Adrien Lucas

Comment #2 on Critical Area Plan for the Quad Parcels at the Celery Fields

October 4, 2019

Mr. Steve Kirk
Sarasota County
Planning and Development Services
1660 Ringling Blvd.
Sarasota, FL

Re:  Critical Area Plan for the Palmer Blvd./Quads Area

Dear Mr. Kirk,

I appreciate your compiling the diverse attributes of my neighborhood and laying out some interpretations in the Critical Area Plan draft.  This is indeed a grand undertaking, and I’m sure you’ve put in many hours!

I see: Adopted in 1985, the CAP was privately initiated and required to meet the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan to map the designated industrial area. 

Click to enlarge
I would be curious to know who initiated this CAP, and if these “players” are still around today.  Even back then, you would think any plan would be publicly initiated.

The draft outlines the zoning districts listed below. I believe Figure 5 should have widened the territory to include a much larger view, and the acreages should be given for residential in the wider area.

The following zoning districts (Figure 5) and acreages exist within the CAP:
  •  PID (Planned Industrial Development) - 167.4
  •  ILW (Industrial, Light Manufacturing and Warehousing) - 75
  •  OUR (Open Use Rural) (Quad’s parcels) - 55.2
  •  PED (Planned Economic Development) (SPA 3) - 29
  •  GU (Government Use) (Ackerman Park, fire station) - 30.2
  •  OUE-1 (Open Use Estate) (stormwater pond) - 15.7
  •  PCD (Planned Commerce Development) - 12.3

Some of the recommended permitted uses should be prohibited, such as the following:
  • Light Industrial (there is enough current capacity in the industrial parks)
  • Office                                                    
  • Research laboratory
  • Warehouse and freight movement
  • Wholesale trade
  • Vocational, trade or business school
  • College or university
  • Vehicle service
  • Sale of vehicle parts and accessories
  • Sale of lumber and building supplies
Implementing Zoning Districts

The Comprehensive Plan identifies the implementing zoning districts for each future land use designation. The following are the implementing zoning districts identified for the MEC designation:
  •  ILW (Industrial Light Manufacturing & Warehousing)
  •  IR (Industrial Research)
  •  PCD (Planned Commerce District) (Planned District)
  •  PED (Planned Economic Development) (Planned District)
  •  GU (Government Use)
Also, I disagree with this recommendation:

N.W. and S.W. Quads
Industrial / Office - Suitable
  • Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and surrounding uses.
  •  Low traffic generator
  •  Retains MEC land in employment use.
An additional zoning district should be added to the UDC: Parks and Recreation.  I think that this should be recommended rather than the blanket MEC.

Just as the City of Sarasota is looking at amending zoning to create this set-apart district, Sarasota County should have such a zoning district.

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

I do not see any solicitation of opinions from public/private/charter schools regarding student transportation needs.  Would you please reach out to some entities for input?

Center Road and Lorraine Road

The completion of the gap in Center Road between Fruitville Road and Palmer Boulevard should be considered to generally improve connectivity in the area of the CAP and complete a mobility loop through the CAP and around the Celery Fields. Alternatively, the construction of a pedestrian/bike path in the area of this gap could be considered.

The Critical Area Plan for this area necessarily involves a discussion of the
extension of Lorraine Road from Palmer Boulevard to Fruitville.  Also, traffic on Palmer from Lorraine to Debrecen will soon be “F” LOS, from Debrecen to Fruitville “F”, and from Debrecen to Lorraine on Fruitville “F” (per traffic engineer Kwamena Sankah).  Why does this matter?  Because traffic that can’t get to Fruitville will even more clog the Apex area.

Traffic studies – current and anticipatory – are notoriously flawed.  It’s impossible to believe studies will approach reality.  They haven’t in the past, and that will be the future story.
Mitigating Improvements Section 3, Mobility, of this study indicated that the improvements associated with the Cattlemen Road Construction Phase II project and the construction of a roundabout or signalization of the Apex Road and Palmer Boulevard intersection will improve the roadway level of service (LOS) in the area. However, the LOS for that section of Palmer Boulevard west of Apex Road will likely continue to be below the adopted LOS. Also, identified as a mitigating improvement is the expansion to 4 lanes of Palmer Boulevard from Porter Road to Apex Road. However, that expansion would conflict with the objective of preserving the existing character of Palmer Boulevard with its open corridor and roadway section also identified in this study. With the development of any of the Quads parcels, Transportation Planning will identify certain improvements such as turn lanes that will be required to accommodate the traffic generated by a proposed use.
There really is no use that won’t increase traffic and ruin the larger neighborhood character.   Keep in mind that identified capital project needs require funding of $1.2 billion.  Where will money come from for creative roadway improvements that will serve the community in a respectful way?

Public/Civic – Suitable  - Agree – but what?
  • Allowed as part of mixed use in PCD and PED. Limited to 50% of PCD. Traditional town center design requirements must be met in PED. N.W. Quad may be too small for PED design requirements
  • No limitations in GU district.
The public has clearly spoken about public uses, so there is no lack of input there. Any use should be put to the public test, with open communication.  Any government uses (Natural History Museum?) should be also put to the public test.

Sincerely,

Glenna Blomquist

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Recap before pending Celery Fields decisions

The Celery Fields offers residents the freedom of walking, exercising, birding, kayaking, fishing - as well as a touch of fresh air, cool breezes at the summit, fantastic sunsets and tranquility.

Celery Fields drone photo courtesy of Emanuel Guzman

While things might be quiet there now, they're not dull. At the moment, our public lands adjacent to the Celery Fields are in a suspended state. We await a critical area plan report that is anticipated to be released in time for a Nov. 6 Board discussion. What the Board decides then is likely to lead to rezonings, area plan amendments, and one or more key public hearings.

Below is a recap of recent activity regarding future possible decisions on the public Quad parcels near the nature and birding sanctuary.

After the Gabbert Waste Facility hearing of August 23, 2017, the Board never swayed from its plan to sell our public land to industrial or other uses. More than 60 people spoke to them at that hearing about all the reasons the public Quad parcels should serve uses that benefit the people. The Board did nothing.

In 2018, after 10 months of input from residents who initiated a formal process to bring ideas from the community for our public lands, the Board did nothing.

Meanwhile James Gabbert began work on his Waste Transfer Station (or, the WTF) on six acres of land he bought adjacent to Quad Parcel #2. Work is ongoing - this is a heavy industrial use situated on thin, failing roads; it will be visible to drivers along the Interstate. Commissioners Al Maio and Charles Hines voted to approve this plan of Gabbert's back in 2014. For more background, see this detailed timeline.

After one commissioner said no further uses - industrial or otherwise - ought to be considered on the Quad parcels unless something is done about the roads, the Board in January ordered the Planning Department to undertake a Critical Area Plan, or CAP of the Quad parcels and the surrounding area.

That process has continued since then. Lead planner Steve Kirk held a neighborhood workshop on May 14. The Church of Hope venue overflowed with citizens offering input. No one spoke in favor of selling our public lands for commercial or industrial uses.

In advance of the workshop, several new proposals or planning concepts were submitted to the Planning Department, which reposted them on this page.

After the May 14 workshop, a few new ideas arose as well:
  • Sarasota Audubon proposed an Urban Forest on Parcel #1, the SE Quad next to the Celery Fields wetlands. Such a forest would offer diversified habitat for birds, new nesting areas, as well as walkable parkland for residents.
  • The Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast called for identifying a larger Rural Heritage Conservation Area that would offer a variety of uses and serve as a Central Park for eastern Sarasota, which is about to explode with new development. The area would include the Quad Parcels, the Celery Fields, and more properties totaling 1,300 acres.
Conservation Foundation Vision of Rural Heritage Area
  • In June, Commissioner Hines threw out an idea to put affordable housing on Parcel #2, and said he'd like to see some action toward that end before the Board took its summer break beginning July 22. 
  • In June, environmental advocate Jono Miller wrote to the Board advising against affordable housing on the Quad parcels. Miller proposed another possible use for the Quad parcels, a history and natural history center. 

Looking West at Sunset

A couple of days ago, lead CAP planner Steve Kirk offered a few updates by phone. Key points are summarized below (italicized sections are not from Kirk but from the editors):
  • The May 14 workshop was the sole public workshop to be held in this process. The gist of the public input was clear - "pretty black and white," as he put it.
  • Kirk aims to present results of the CAP study to the Board -- the tentative date is Nov. 6, 2019.
  • Planning will transmit the critical area plan results - including community input - to the Board a week before the public discussion on Nov. 6 (or whenever it's held). No information about the findings of the area planning process will be available to the public before it is transmitted to the Board, Kirk noted. The Board authorized the report, and its contents will not be shared with the public ahead of when it's sent to the Board.
  • When the Commissioners discuss the CAP, that discussion is not a public hearing. Yet, at that point, the Commissioners can do as they wish - they asked for the study, but are not bound by it, so they can ignore it and proceed to authorize a rezoning for whatever purposes they wish.
  • Whatever the Commissioners decide, they will probably order a rezoning of the Quad parcels, and a CAP amendment to enable changes to the plan. They could even order a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Kirk added. Each of these processes calls for a public hearing. For example, if the Board votes to rezone one or more parcels for industrial use, even if no industrial developer is known to be asking for it, that rezoning process can go forward.
EDITOR's NOTE: This could lead to a peculiar step in planning: At an industrial rezoning hearing, for example, the public will be given the opportunity to speak, but there might be no information as to what sort of industrial use could eventually go on these lands near the Celery Fields. Should the Board decide to authorize industrial rezoning, respect for the area and for the community demands that any such directive be very specific, and include strong proactive and protective constraints: No heavy industry, no trucks, no environmental pollution, no eyesores, etc. Anything less would open the doors to yet another Gabbert waste facility, giant slovenly warehouse, or worse.

Commissioners Hines and Detert

The Board has not yet given any indication to Planning about affordable housing. They could address the issue upon their return. A"Think Tank" workshop for the Board is scheduled for Aug. 21.

While the Commissioners could direct planning to take steps to put affordable housing on the Quad parcels, doing so before the CAP process is complete would be out of sequence.

If the Board has any respect for sound planning or for the community, it will allow the planning department to complete a rigorous critical planning process, then use the results as the basis for considering the best options for our public lands at the Celery Fields.


Courtesy of Chuck Behrmann

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Conservation Foundation seeks Rural Heritage Area

Public Notice from the County announces rezoning of the NW parcel of the Quads at Apex and Palmer from its open use rural designation to Government Use. Hearing scheduled for July 10, 9 a.m. It appears that the rezone is solely addressing the fire station portion of the parcel - 2 acres - leaving about 7 acres for another use yet to be determined.




At the eastern end of the 1,300 acres which the Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast envisions for a Rural Heritage Conservation Area (this "central park" would contain the Quads, the Celery Fields, Big Cat Habitat and more) the Foundation is trying to preserve 24 acres near Tatum Ridge Elementary from yet another housing development. If the Foundation can reach its goal, he parcel would become a permanent conservation area set aside for the community's benefit. It currently has a horse farm on it.

If you have a little spare cash, please consider helping them meet a June 30 deadline to come up with an installment payment of $650,000. Your help would also demonstrate community support for the larger Rural Heritage vision.

If the County sees we care about this "Central Park" for East Sarasota, perhaps they'll be less inclined to expand industrial uses on our public lands at the Celery Fields.



Thank you.

Sunday, June 9, 2019

Jono Miller: History and Natural History at the Celery Fields, Workforce housing elsewhere

This letter was sent to the Board of County Commissioners (Chair: Charles Hines) from Jono Miller, who proposes two new projects -- a history and natural history facility on one of the public parcels, and affordable housing near the bus transfer station and current Sarasota archive on Porter Rd.

Charles et al.

I'm writing in reference to the article in the Herald Tribune this morning regarding surplus lands and affordable housing. I applaud any approach to surplus lands that places what the land can do for the County or its mere cash value.

I don't know if any commissioner's have advocated using any of the quad parcels for affordable housing, but, based on the handout at the May 14th public workshop, we know the public has suggested co-housing development, tiny homes, assisted living facility, assisted living apartments with staff housing, adult day care, elder cottage housing, AND affordable housing. There's probably a need for all those, but I don't they they represent the highest and best uses for the quad parcels.

As I testified at the workshop, I think the question we should be asking regarding the three quad parcels (or any surplus land) is " What can be done here that benefits the community, that cannot be done elsewhere?" That's because at this time It is only the three quad parcels that have the potential to synergistically contribute to the Celery Fields Stormwater Facility (and de facto nature park). Uses that are either neutral or detract from the Celery Fields should be located elsewhere. What sorts of uses might augment the celery fields? Projects that build off of the unique aspects of the site -- aspects related to water management, agricultural history, bird watching, or outdoor resource-based experiences in general.

Having said that, I am supportive of using county land to facilitate workforce housing, but I don't think the County should be giving surplus land away for such uses. Selling at a discounted rate might make sense, but I fear eliminating land costs for some projects could render other potential workforce housing projects that have to buy land unfeasible and create a presumption that the County will provide additional land in the future, absolving entrepreneurs of the burden of making the numbers work otherwise.

I am once again attaching a proposal to maximize the potential of county land adjacent to the bus transfer facility (for workforce housing) as a means to maximize part of one of the celery field quad parcels (by co-locating cultural history interpretation with natural history). The ability to reduce the number of household cars by creating workforce housing adjacent to the bus transfer facility is an example of something that cannot be easily replicated elsewhere. Location, location, location. And using that land sale, even at discounted rates, to fund a complementary publicly accessible amenity at the celery fields would potentiate both the transit-accessible housing and the celery fields.

Sincerely,



Jono [Miller]

Documents included with letter:

Add caption



Sunday, May 12, 2019

Information page for Quads Critical Area Plan Workshop

The planning workshop that seeks public input on rezoning the public lands at the Celery Fields will be held at 6 pm, May 14, at the Church of Hope1560 Wendell Kent Rd, Sarasota, FL 34240. 

The Planning Department has posted community input and proposals here:

>>Index to county planning links <<
   
      Documents prepared by the Planning Department include:

1. Memorandum from Planning

2. Community proposals via the 2018 Fresh Start process:
3. Reports to the Board from Fresh Start: 7.11.17 and 9.12.17

     Proposals are still coming in, so more will probably be added to this page.

This is the one opportunity for all who love the Celery Fields to come, listen, and voice their thoughts and concerns. The workshop begins at 6 pm - 


at the Church of Hope, 1560 Wendell Kent Rd, Sarasota, FL 34240, where James Gabbert introduced his proposal for a waste processing facility in January 2017. 

The public record of this workshop goes to the Board, which will decide the future of these public lands. Here are some of our concerns:

Not everyone on the Board sees the point of using public lands for the public good. With thoughtful stewardship, public lands can provide needed public facilities and activities. Why sell them to enrich a couple of private developers?

Industrial uses will generate traffic, noise, dead space incompatible with the developing natural beauty of the Celery Fields area, and its recreational potential.

The scope of this process is narrow. When Gabbert proposed his waste processing facility, the county failed to acknowledge the existence of the Celery Fields. This plan should not exclude important considerations that PLANNING should be thinking about now:
1 - future protective measures for wildlife, residents and visitors;
2 - the impacts of coming growth in East County;
3 - quality of life benefits from safe roads and a tranquil environment.
With care and intelligent stewardship, this very special area will return investments a hundredfold -- more about this here.